On a side note, please identify yourself. Though you seem reasonably intelligent, your anonymity makes me less inclined to listen to what you have to say.
The issue, however, is not whether I know you. The issue is this:
There is an imbalance of power in a communication between an identified and unidentified participant. It's like a conversation in which you can send a letter right to my mailbox and know that it will be received (if not necessarily read), but I have to respond via personals in the paper which anyone -- but not necessarily my intended recipient -- can read, and I can't verify that you'll receive my responses, let alone that you care anymore. You are inherently less invested in the exchange than I am.
Or maybe it's like conversing with someone from inside a locked room with a one-way mirror.
No, knowing a little bit of information about you won't alleviate that problem. But it would make me feel better.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2006-10-17 12:04 pm (UTC)(link)Can there be any doubt that anonymous posters are less likely to say anything worthwhile?
no subject
There is an imbalance of power in a communication between an identified and unidentified participant. It's like a conversation in which you can send a letter right to my mailbox and know that it will be received (if not necessarily read), but I have to respond via personals in the paper which anyone -- but not necessarily my intended recipient -- can read, and I can't verify that you'll receive my responses, let alone that you care anymore. You are inherently less invested in the exchange than I am.
Or maybe it's like conversing with someone from inside a locked room with a one-way mirror.
No, knowing a little bit of information about you won't alleviate that problem. But it would make me feel better.